The whole time I was watching this film, I just wanted to reach
through my computer monitor, grab Andi by the shoulders, and shout, “This is “Vogue”,
for cripes sake.”
The most apt thing one can say about the film is what
another reviewer I read said: that this movie fails itself.
For most of it’s running time “The Devil Wears Prada” is a
strong, character drama about a girl becoming a young woman, not getting the
job she thought she would in university but nonetheless growing personally,
becoming proficient and developing an interest in something in which she had
none previously.
Then, a little more than halfway through the proscribed year
she is to spend working at the fictionalized version of “Vogue”, she chucks it
all to work at some alt-weekly which probably would have closed down three
years later.
Thus, one main take-away from this film is what I wanted to
scream at Andi, that “Runway/Vogue” didn’t get to be “Runway/Vogue” without the
kind of leadership Miranda Priestly exercises, and no other category of
magazine or any other kind of venture with the reputation of “Vogue” earns said
reputation without someone similar to Miranda at the helm. That would include
20th-Century Fox and even Anne Hathaway herself if you want to carry
it that far.
My other take away is the dialectacle message the film
contains: namely, you can either be like Miranda Priestly, being both devious
and successful, or you can be happy and work for a small operation which won’t
lead to any opportunity.
Personally, I would have liked to see Andi stick it out for
the year, then make her speech about how she couldn’t live in Miranda’s world.
After this, we would see her applying at a magazine or TV station back home in
Ohio, still with the bit about Miranda recommending her for the job, but with a
more confident Andi showing us that, even though she didn’t decide to trod
Miranda’s path, that year with the Dragon Lady was some of the most invaluable
time of her life.
No comments:
Post a Comment