Monday, December 2, 2024

ANCHOR OF HOPE CHRISTMAS APPEAL

Dear faithful supporters,

As we reflect on this special season, we are filled with gratitude for your ongoing support of Anchor of Hope. Your generosity and compassion continues to make a lasting difference in the lives of the women and families we serve!

This Christmas, we are reminded of the hope, love, and new beginnings that we strive to share throughout the year. Thank you for partnering with us to bring light and hope to those in need. 

This year, due to the mail strike, we have had to pivot to sending our newsletter solely via email. This saves on printing costs and stamps, however we are not able to receive, via snail mail, our regular donations that usually come in this time of year.  If you feel led to give a year-end donation, please feel free to e-transfer to bookkeeper@anchorofhope.ca or feel free to either drop off a cash or cheque donation to the Centre, or if you would prefer, we also have a debit/credit card machine here at the Centre. We would be thrilled to see you and we would be more than happy to give you a tour of the Centre!  Thank  you so much for considering making a donation to help us reach our year-end goal. 

Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a New Year filled with peace, joy, and blessings!

With heartfelt thanks,

Heather West

Centre Director
Anchor of Hope Pregnancy & Family Care Centre
135 Elgin Street
Madoc, ON
K0K 2K0

613-473-0606 

MUSLIM GIRL ACCUSES TEACHER OF ISLAMIPHOBIA WITH TERRIBLE CONSEQUENCES

MailOnline US - news, sport, celebrity, science and health stories

 

Muslim schoolgirl admits lying that her teacher was Islamophobic - which led to him being decapitated by a jihadist - because she was suspended for two days and worried her parents would be angry

Samuel Paty, 47, was brutally stabbed and decapitated on October 16, 2020

By DAVID AVERRE and ELENA SALVONI

Published: 10:59 EST, 26 November 2024 | Updated: 06:53 EST, 27 November 2024

 

The Muslim schoolgirl who accused her teacher of Islamophobia and began rumours that led to a jihadist decapitating him in the street in France has admitted lying and apologised to the victim's family in a remarkable court hearing today.

 

History and geography teacher Samuel Paty was murdered on October 16, 2020 by Abdoullakh Anzorov, an 18-year-old Islamist radical of Chechen origin.

 

Anzorov tracked down 47-year-old Paty and brutally hacked his head off after seeing pictures and videos of him circulated on social media as part of a ruthless campaign of harassment.

 

It began after the schoolgirl in question claimed that Paty had ordered Muslim students to leave his classroom while he showed the rest of the class caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad by satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo.

 

But she revealed today that she had not even been present in the class and invented the lie, fearing repercussions from her parents after she was suspended two days for bad behaviour.

 

The student, who was 13 at the time of the murder and whose identity remains protected due to her age, cried as she addressed Paty's family.

 

'I know it's hard to hear, but I wanted to apologise... I wanted to apologise sincerely. I'm sorry for destroying your life,' she reportedly said through tears.

 

'I apologise for my lie that brought us all back here,' she added, admitting to those in attendance, including the accused: 'Without me, no one would be here.'

 

The schoolgirl's father, Brahim Chnina, is accused of launching the online harassment campaign against Paty, while other teen students were tried last year after they identified him for the attacker in exchange for a few hundred euros.

 

Anzorov, who had requested asylum in France and travelled more than 60 miles to cut down Paty in public, was killed by police shortly after the murder near the school in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine west of Paris.

 

Paty is regarded as a free-speech hero by many in France.

 

He had shown the Charlie Hebdo caricatures to students as part of an ethics class in which his pupils were discussing the fallout of the 2015 terror attack on newspaper's offices in which 12 people were murdered by extremists.

 

But he had not ordered any students to leave the room, instead telling them what he was going to do as part of the ethics lesson before inviting them to turn away if they thought they would be offended by the caricatures.

 

Seven men and one woman are appearing at the Special Assize Court in Paris amid the trial over his murder, which is set to last until December 20.

 

Chnina is one of them, facing charges of association with a terrorist organisation for his alleged involvement in the online campaign targeting Paty.

 

Six students, including Chnina's daughter, were tried last year for their role in Paty's death.

 

The schoolgirl had accompanied her father to file a complaint at the time. 'I wanted to tell my parents that it was false, I knew that my father was not going to do anything to me , but I was afraid to say it,' she said in court today.

 

After Paty's murder, she was taken into police custody, during which time she continued to lie. 'My teacher had been decapitated, my father was in police custody, I couldn't say it was false,' she said.

 

She finally confessed the truth after 30 hours and two police interviews.

 

The schoolgirl received an 18-month suspended sentence for the slanderous allegations she made against Paty that ultimately proved the catalyst for his murder.

 

Her five co-defendants, all of whom were aged 14 or 15 at the time of the murder, faced charges of criminal conspiracy with the aim of preparing aggravated violence.

 

Four were handed suspended sentences but one received a six-month term with an electronic tag after being identified as the person who pointed Paty out to Anzorov.

 

Also on trial at the court in Paris is Abdelhakim Sefrioui, a 65-year-old Franco-Moroccan Islamist activist.

 

He and Chnina spread the teenager's lies on social networks with the aim, according to the prosecution, of 'designating a target', 'provoking a feeling of hatred' and 'thus preparing several crimes'.

 

Both men have been in pre-trial detention for the past four years.

 

Between October 9 and 13, Chnina spoke to Anzorov nine times by telephone after he published videos criticising Paty, the investigation showed.

 

Sefrioui meanwhile posted a video criticising what he considered to be Islamophobia in France and describing Paty as a 'teaching thug'.

 

He insisted to investigators he was only seeking 'administrative sanctions' against Paty, not violence.

 

Two young friends of the attacker are facing even graver charges of 'complicity in terrorist murder', a crime punishable by life imprisonment.

 

Naim Boudaoud, 22, and Azim Epsirkhanov, 23, a Russian of Chechen origin, are accused of having accompanied Anzorov to a knife shop in the northern city of Rouen the day before the attack.

 

'Nearly three years of investigation have never managed to establish that Naim Boudaoud had any knowledge of the attacker's criminal plans,' his lawyers Adel Fares and Hiba Rizkallah said.

 

Boudaoud is accused of accompanying Anzorov to buy two replica guns and steel pellets the day of the attack.

 

Epsirkhanov admitted he had received 800 euros from Anzorov to find him a real gun but had not succeeded.

 

Four other defendants interacted with Anzorov online prior to Paty's murder.

 

Yusuf Cinar, a 22-year-old Turkish national, shared a jihadist Snapchat account with him, that later published images of Paty's killing.

 

Ismail Gamaev, a 22-year-old Russian of Chechen origin with refugee status, and Louqmane Ingar, also 22, exchanged jihadist content on a Snapchat group with Anzorov. The first posted an image of Paty's head with smiley faces after the killing.

 

The only woman on trial is 36-year-old Priscilla Mangel, a Muslim convert who conversed with Paty's killer on X, describing the teacher's class as 'an example of the war waged by (France's) Republican institutions against Muslims'.

 

Thibault de Montbrial and Pauline Ragot, lawyers for Mickaelle Paty, one of the sisters of the murdered teacher, said his killing had highlighted the 'depth of Islamist infiltration in France'.

 

The trial should 'allow our society to become aware of a mortal peril', they added.

DEI IS IN RETREAT BECAUSE IT IS A DISASTER, NOT BECAUSE TRUMP DOESN'T LIKE IT

National Review

 

DEI Is in Retreat Because It Is a Disaster, Not Because Trump Doesn’t Like It

By Noah Rothman

November 26, 2024 12:47 PM

 

Walmart, America’s largest retailer, announced this week that it will pare back its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, and the New York Times is giving conservative activist Robby Starbuck most of the credit.

 

Starbuck, “an anti-D.E.I. activist and a social media influencer, declared victory on Monday,” Lauren Hirsch of the Times reported:

 

block quote

As a result of the changes, third-party merchants will no longer be able to sell some L.G.B.T.Q.-themed items on Walmart.com that are marketed to children. The company will also stop funding the Center for Racial Equity, a nonprofit initiative that Walmart has backed with $100 million, when the agreement expires next year. And the company will stop sharing data with the Human Rights Campaign, a nonprofit that tracks businesses’ L.G.B.T.Q. policies. It will also stop using the terms D.E.I. and Latinx in official communications.

block quote end

 

Starbuck himself is taking a deserved victory lap. He described the changes in store for Walmart’s employees as well as its corporate governance, all of which are wholly desirable. But Starbuck isn’t the sole architect of this development, in the Times’ telling. The paper and other political observers see the hidden hand of Donald Trump pulling corporate strings behind the scenes.

 

“Walmart’s actions underline the risk it may see in a public fight, particularly as the anti-D.E.I. agenda gets a boost after Donald J. Trump’s election,” Hirsch observed. Bloomberg analyst Joe Wiesenthal agreed. Unlike in 2016, “corporations are going to move much more in line with the new administration,” he wrote. “And Walmart, in particular, will be a bright signal to other corporates to do the same.” To this, a fine pseudonymous Twitter account (which you should follow) offered some salient pushback:

 

block quote

This is backwards; conservative activism preceded anything the new administration has done, it is following its voters, not leading.

https://t.co/Dq0bt6O0Kj

— NeverTweet (@LOLNeverTweet)

November 26, 2024

block quote end

 

This has the correct sequence of events. DEI was in retreat well before Donald Trump returned to the political fore, and even before his reelection to the presidency was generally regarded as a plausible outcome of the 2024 election cycle.

 

As I wrote at the time, the year that delivered the heaviest blows to the divisive and discriminatory ideology masquerading as best practices in human resources departments wasn’t 2024. It was 2023.

 

Pushback against DEI was a project first engaged by conservative Republican lawmakers in states like Florida, Texas, Ohio, and North and South Carolina, who executed the anti-DEI intellectual frameworks established by conservative thinkers and activists. The baton was then picked up by conservatives on the Supreme Court, who insisted on “colorblindness for all” in the college admissions process. The legal predicate for dismantling DEI having been established, the lawsuits soon followed. The threat those actions posed to the bottom line suddenly rendered DEI a financially prohibitive project. Thus, Walmart joined other big employers like Lowe’s, Harley-Davidson, John Deere, Ford, Microsoft, Meta, Google, and more in sloughing off the obligation they once felt to contribute to this extortion racket. They just needed the proper inducement.

 

But Trump wasn’t that inducement. It was the intellectual scaffolding erected by conservative theorists that gave a leg up to lawmakers and political appointees, eventually creating a set of incentive structures to which large firms had to respond, if only in deference to their fiduciary responsibility to their investors. That’s how this is supposed to work, and it did in this case. But to reverse the sequence of events and conclude that naked corporate cowardice is responsible for DEI’s retreat — thereby absolving that philosophy of the perversions that rendered it so unattractive — obscures more than it reveals.

TRUMP SIGNS TRANSITION AGREEMENT WITH BIDEN WHITE HOUSE; WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL?

Fort Worth Star-Telegram

 

Trump signs transition agreement with Biden White House. What does it entail?

BY BRENDAN RASCIUS

NOVEMBER 27, 2024 4:27 PM

 

President-elect Donald Trump has signed onto an agreement that will help create a smooth transition of power between administrations.

 

The agreement — known as a memorandum of understanding — was announced by Susie Wiles, Trump’s incoming chief of staff, in a Nov. 26 statement.

 

“After completing the selection process of his incoming Cabinet, President-elect Trump is entering the next phase of his administration’s transition by executing a Memorandum of Understanding with President Joe Biden’s White House,” Wiles said.

 

What exactly does the agreement provide?

 

It allows for Trump’s Cabinet nominees to begin coordinating with the federal departments they are poised to take over in less than two months.

 

The nominees — who include Sen. Marco Rubio for secretary of state and Scott Bessent for treasury secretary — will now be able to deploy “landing teams” to these departments.

 

“The Transition landing teams will quickly integrate directly into federal agencies and departments with access to documents and policy sharing,” Wiles said. “Per the agreement, the Transition will disclose the landing team members to the Biden Administration.”

 

Wiles also said that the Trump transition team “will operate as a self-sufficient organization.”

 

To that point, the team will not sign a separate agreement with the General Services Administration, which is required by law to offer federal funding, office space and other support to presidents-elect during the transition period.

 

“The agreement dictates that the Trump Vance Transition will utilize private funding,” Wiles said, “providing cost savings to American taxpayers. Donors to the Transition will be disclosed to the public.”

 

The memo also revealed the existence an ethics plan, which includes promises that incoming officials will avoid conflicts of interest and safeguard classified information, among other things.

 

The agreement comes three weeks after Trump won the presidential election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

 

In comparison, Biden signed onto a similar memorandum with the first Trump administration in early September 2020, weeks before the presidential election, according to The Washington Post.

 

Additionally, Trump’s team has not formalized an agreement with the Department of Justice that would authorize the FBI to perform background checks on nominees, according to Reuters.

 

“Circumventing background checks would buck a long-established norm in Washington, but the president has the final authority on whom he nominates and picks to conduct background checks,” according to the outlet.

 

Wiles, in her statement, said Trump’s team has “existing security and information protections built in, which means we will not require additional government and bureaucratic oversight.”

BBC GIVES WOMEN'S SPORTS AWARD TO PLAYER WHO FAILED SEX ELIGIBILITY TEST, INCITING J.K. ROWLING'S WRATH

Fox News

 

BBC gives women's sports award to player who failed sex eligibility test, inciting J.K. Rowling's wrath

Rowling has been one of the most vocal opponents of transgender inclusion

By Jackson Thompson Fox News

Published November 26, 2024 5:15pm EST

 

Famed Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling delivered one of her typical sports takes Tuesday.

 

The BBC awarded its annual Women's Footballer of The Year award to Zambian player Barbra Banda. Banda withdrew from the Zambian squad for the Women’s Africa Cup of Nations in Morocco after failing to meet sex eligibility requirements in 2022, the BBC previously reported.

 

Banda was allowed to compete at the Paris Olympics and has become the second-leading scorer in the United States’ National Women’s Soccer League (NWSL) this season, playing for the Orlando Pride.

 

Banda received the most votes from BBC readers after being shortlisted by a panel of what the BBC said were "experts involved in football," including coaches, players and non-BBC journalists.

 

Rowling spoke out in a post on X.

 

"Presumably the BBC decided this was more time efficient than going door to door to spit directly in women's faces," Rowling wrote.

 

Rowling has been one of the most vocal opponents of transgender rights and inclusion, especially in her home country of England.

 

Transgender participation in women's sports has become an internationally debated issue, and it became one of the most-discussed issues of the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

 

In June, a survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago asked respondents to weigh in on whether transgender athletes of both sexes should be permitted to participate in sports leagues that correspond to their preferred gender identity instead of their biological sex.

 

Sixty-five percent answered that it should either never be or rarely allowed. When those polled were asked specifically about adult transgender female athletes competing on women’s sports teams, 69% opposed it.

 

The United Nations says nearly 900 biological females have fallen short of the podium because they were beaten out by trans athletes.

 

The findings were compiled by Reem Alsalem, the UN's Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, titled "Violence against women and girls in sports."

 

The report said more than 600 athletes did not medal in more than 400 competitions in 29 different sports, totaling over 890 medals, according to information as of March 30.

 

"The replacement of the female sports category with a mixed-sex category has resulted in an increasing number of female athletes losing opportunities, including medals, when competing against males," the report said.

 

Banda was among the controversial cases involving athletes who previously failed sex eligibility tests at the Paris Olympics. Boxers Imane Khelif of Algeria and Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan each won gold medals in their respective competitions and were allowed to compete despite failing sex eligibility tests at previous international events.

FAMILY OUTRAGED AFTER HOSPITAL SENDS 86 YEAR OLD BLIND WOMAN TO DOWNTOWN EASTSIDE SHELTER

family outraged after hospital sends 86-year-old blind woman to Downtown Eastside shelter "It happens all the time," said Alice Kendall, executive director of the DTES Women's Centre Author of the article: David Carrigg, Gwendolyn Deraspe, 86 on Wednesday who is blind and has mobility issues, was discharged from hospital Tuesday and sent by taxi to a women's shelter in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside, despite the shelter being unable to care for her. She was later returned to Ridge Meadows Hospital. But upon arrival, the shelter’s director told the driver and his backseat passenger, Gwendolyn Deraspe, that they couldn’t accommodate her, and she was told to go to Vancouver General Hospital’s emergency department instead. En route to VGH, Fraser Health contacted the cab driver and had Deraspe returned to Ridge Meadows. “She’s been treated horribly,” her son-in-law, Jim Caya, said Wednesday about the hours-long ordeal. “This situation makes me ashamed to be a Canadian. To treat people like this is cruel.” Fraser Health has apologized to the family and said in a statement that they “should have done better” to connect the patient with housing support. “In this case, we failed to confirm ahead of discharge whether the shelter had an appropriate bed available to the patient,” the health authority said. “We are truly sorry for this mistake.” But the director of the Vancouver shelter where Deraspe was sent said hospitals often offload patients who require care to shelters. “It happens all the time,” said Alice Kendall, executive director of the DTES Women’s Centre, as she stood outside the 32-bed overflow shelter on East Hastings Street awaiting Deraspe’s arrival on Tuesday. Kendall said she told Fraser Health twice beforehand that the shelter couldn’t accommodate Deraspe. Yet at 2:30 p.m. on Tuesday, Deraspe was escorted out of Ridge Meadows Hospital in Maple Ridge and into a waiting Alouette Taxi cab. When the cab arrived in Vancouver an hour later, Kendall dashed across the street to tell the driver and Deraspe that the shelter couldn’t help her. Sunrise Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. “We advised that we could not accommodate her as our emergency shelters are not equipped to care for someone with her complex needs and because the Downtown Eastside is not a safe or appropriate place for her,” she explained to Postmedia News later. “How is an emergency drop-in shelter in the Downtown Eastside a safe or appropriate placement for an 86-year-old blind woman with no family or connections here?” The shelter was able to make arrangements for Deraspe to go to VGH. However, as the cab made its way to the VGH ER — and after Fraser Health was contacted by Postmedia — it was diverted back to Ridge Meadows Hospital. Kendall said she hoped the health authority could find a suitable discharge location for Deraspe — “somewhere where she is safe and can get the medical supports she requires.” Alice Kendall, executive director of the Downtown Eastside Women’s Centre, says it’s not uncommon for hospitals to discharge patients to shelters. The centre was unable to provide the care and support Gwendolyn Deraspe required. PHOTO BY NICK PROCAYLO /10106514A On Wednesday, Caya said his mother-in-law had been given a bed in a common area of Ridge Meadows Hospital for the night. She was later moved to a room on a ward, while he awaits a meeting to discuss next steps. Caya is married to Deraspe’s daughter, Maria, and they’re not able to house her, physically or financially. The senior, who was born in the U.K. in 1938, moved to Canada in 1994 to be closer to her daughter and grandchildren. Article content Shortly after arriving, she met and married Jim Deraspe, a Canadian citizen, and the pair lived together, first in the Tri-Cities and then with his son in Cranbrook, until Jim died suddenly in July. In recent years, Jim had been caring for Deraspe, who is legally blind due to cataracts and has heart disease and mobility issues. Caya said Deraspe never applied for Canadian citizenship, and as a result, isn’t covered by MSP. A few days after her husband died, his son returned her to the Lower Mainland, where she ended up in Ridge Meadows Hospital requiring medical care. She was there for four months until she was discharged against her family’s objections on Tuesday. Caya said his wife is “destroyed” by her mother’s plight, while he has been working to determine her immigration status. He has been told that she can apply for status on humanitarian grounds, but the wait could be up to two years. He has also reached out to legal aid to get help seeking health and housing support, but was denied assistance. He’s not sure what to do next. “If B.C. Housing could help her get a little flat, or if she could get treatment for her cataracts, she could get her life back,” he said. In a statement, Fraser Health said Deraspe was brought back to Ridge Meadows Hospital where staff are working to connect her to “appropriate partners” who can assist in finding housing. The health authority admitted that in Deraspe’s case staff failed to confirm ahead of time whether the shelter had an appropriate bed available. “When a patient is discharged into a shelter, we make every effort to help them find a bed within our region in a facility able to meet their needs. In this case, we were unable to connect the patient with a shelter in our region with the capacity and ability to meet her needs,” said the statement. https://vancouversun.com/news/bc-family-outraged-hospital-86-year-old-blind-woman-downtown-eastside-shelter

THE COLLAPSE OF ANTI-TRUMP LAWFARE

National Review

 

The Collapse of Anti-Trump Lawfare

By Andrew C. McCarthy

November 25, 2024 4:21 PM

 

A judge has granted Jack Smith's request to dismiss the 2020 election-interference case against Trump.

 

Biden-Harris Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith has formally asked Judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss the so-called January 6 case — the 2020 election-interference prosecution of President-elect Donald Trump. Late Monday, Chutkan granted the motion.

 

In consultation with DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), Smith determined that the long-standing DOJ guidance on criminal proceedings against a sitting president dictated that the current indictment in the case be dismissed without prejudice to the potential reindictment of the charges following Trump’s anticipated exit from office in January 2029.

 

Smith made the move with the consent of the president-elect and his defense lawyers. This makes sense. The events in the indictment occurred around the 2020 election. By 2029 they will be time-barred under the five-year federal statute of limitations. Ergo, there would be little point in reindicting them at that time.

 

The OLC guidance dates from the Watergate era. It was refined in the Clinton era to deal specifically with the question of whether a sitting president could be indicted with the proceedings then held in abeyance until after his term in office ended. The Office of Legal Counsel concluded that even this could make it impossible for the president effectively to carry out his duties; its guidance cites the burden of public stigma and opprobrium caused by criminal charges, coupled with the mental and physical burden a president would bear due to the need to prepare a criminal defense.

 

The 2000 OLC guidance acknowledged that dismissing charges only to recharge later could create a significant statute of limitations issue — because the president’s term is four years long and the statute of limitations calls for charges to be filed within five years of the alleged crime, most pre-presidency criminal acts would be shielded from prosecution (i.e., any that occurred over a year before the president took office). The Office of Legal Counsel conjectured that a court might solve this problem by “equitably toll[ing]” (pausing or suspending) the statute of limitations. But there is no assurance that a court could or would do so — particularly when the American public had elected the president despite the charges against him.

 

Obviously, this sits uneasily with the claim that presidents are not above the law.

 

Smith will undoubtedly follow suit in Florida and withdraw the government’s appeal to the Eleventh Circuit of Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of the Mar-a-Lago documents indictment. Smith has been under a directive to alert both Judge Chutkan and the Eleventh Circuit of his views about further proceedings by next Monday, December 2.

 

Smith’s actions also strengthen Trump’s hand in seeking the dismissal of Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg’s charges against him. Last week, Trump was given until December 2 to file a new motion to dismiss based on his election as president (supplementing his earlier motion to dismiss based on the Supreme Court’s July 1 immunity ruling).

 

In arguing that the jury verdicts of guilty should be vacated and the indictment dismissed, Trump’s lawyers will surely contend that further proceedings in the Manhattan case — even though it is a state prosecution, unlike Smith’s federal cases — would pose the same problems of harm to the nation by compromising the president’s capacity to perform his unparalleled constitutional responsibilities.

 

The cases against Trump are either bogus (Bragg’s case), legal reaches (Smith’s January 6 case and Fulton County DA Fani Willis’s similar RICO case), or already dismissed (Smith’s Mar-a-Lago documents and obstruction case — the strongest of the bunch). Because of that, I agree with the dismissal of the charges in these cases. I must say, however, that I am unpersuaded by the contention that the mere existence of charges held in abeyance — rather than their dismissal — is required by the potential stigma and anxiety they portend.

 

Trump ran for president with the national electorate well aware that he was under federal charges and had been found guilty in Bragg’s case. He won decisively (even if “landslide” descriptions are an exaggeration), beating his Democratic rival in both the Electoral College and the popular vote. If there is an enduring stigma that will affect Trump’s performance, I don’t detect it.

 

Of course, the Justice Department has to apply a standard for all future cases, not just the strange cases brought against Trump. It is not difficult to imagine situations where there would, indeed, be great opprobrium and anxiety were a sitting president confronting criminal prosecution upon leaving office.

 

Anti-Trump lawfare has collapsed.